赵雁飞;李涌

• 1:印第安纳大学凯莱商学院
• 2:内华达大学商学院
• 3:内华达大学Troesh创业创新中心

摘要(Abstract)：

本文评论了Hitt和Xu (2019)的论文,该论文总结了制度理论与创业交叉领域的最新研究进展。我们同意两位作者的建议,即学者应该发展一套理论上严谨且全面的方法来研究制度对创业战略和绩效的影响。与此同时,我们指出两条未来的研究路径,希望这两条途径能够拓展新制度经济学的观点,即当前许多制度与创业的交叉研究的基础。首先,我们讨论了近期关于制度逻辑和制度复杂性的研究,强调其在拓宽我们对制度的认识方面的潜力。其次,我们呼吁对创业研究中的制度理论进行更多的情境化研究。

关键词(KeyWords)： 制度;创业;制度多中心主义;制度逻辑;制度复杂

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 赵雁飞;李涌

Email:

参考文献(References)：

• [1]Aldrich,H.E.,&Cliff,J.E.2003.The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship:Toward a family embeddedness perspective.Journal of Business Venturing,18:573-596.
• [2]Arthur,W.B.1989.Competing technologies,increasing returns,and lock-in by historical events.Economic Journal,99:116-131.
• [3]Batjargal,B.,Hitt,M.A.,Tsui,A.S.,Arregle,J.L.,Webb,J.W.,&Miller,T.L.2013.Intitutional polycentrism,entrepreneurs’social networks,and new venture growth.Academy of Management Journal,56:1024-1049.
• [4]Bruton,G.D.,Ahlstrom,D.,&Li,H.L.2010.Institutional theory and entrepreneurship:Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,34:421-440.
• [5]Bruton,G.D.,Ahlstrom,D.,&Puky,T.2009.Institutional differences and the development of entrepreneurial ventures:A comparison of the venture capital industries in Latin America and Asia.Journal of International Business Studies,40:762-778.
• [6]China Daily.2014.Size of Chinese family getting smaller.http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2014-05/15/content_17508456.htm.Accessed on Apr.15,2019.
• [7]Cobb,J.A.,Wry,T.,&Zhao,E.Y.2016.Funding financial inclusion:Institutional logics and the contextual contingency of funding for microfinance organizations.Academy of Management Journal,59:2103-2131.
• [8]Di Maggio,P.J.,&Powell,W.W.1983.The iron cage revisited:Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.American Sociological Review,48:147-160.
• [9]Greenwood,R.,Raynard,M.,Kodeih,F.,Micelotta,E.R.,&Lounsbury,M.2011.Institutional complexity and organizational responses.Academy of Management Annals,5:317-371.
• [10]Grimes,M.,Williams,T.,&Zhao,E.Y.2019.Anchors aweigh:The sources,variety,and challenges of mission drift.Academy of Management Review,Forthcoming.
• [11]Hitt,M.,&Xu,K.2019.Institutions and entrepreneurial strategies.Quarterly Journal of Managemnet,4:1-14.
• [12]Hofstede,G.1980.Culture’s consequences.Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications.
• [13]House,R.J.,Hanges,P.J.,Javidan,M.,Dorfman,P.W.,&Gupta,V.2004.Culture,leadership,and organizations:The GLOBE study of 62 societies.Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications.
• [14]Iriyama,A.,Li,Y.,&Madhavan,R.2010.Spiky globalization of venture capital investments:The influence of prior human networks.Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,4:128-145.
• [15]Klapper,L.,Laeven,L.,&Rajan,R.2006.Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship.Journal of Financial Economics,82:591-629.
• [16]Kogut,B.,&Ragin,C.2006.Exploring complexity when diversity is limited:Institutional complementarity in theories of rule of law and national systems revisited.European Management Review,3:44-59.
• [17]Li,Y.2008.Duration analysis of venture capital staging:A real options perspective.Journal of Business Venturing,23:497-512.
• [18]Li,Y.,Hernandez,E.,&Gwon,S.2019.When do ethnic communities affect foreign location choice?Dual entry strategies of Korean banks in China.Academy of Management Journal,62:172-195.
• [19]Li,Y.,Vertinsky,I.B.,&Li,J.2014.National distances,international experience,and venture capital investment performance.Journal of Business Venturing,29:471-489.
• [20]Li,Y.,&Zahra,S.A.2012.Formal institutions,culture,and venture capital activity:A cross-country analysis.Journal of Business Venturing,27:95-111.
• [21]Li,Y.,Zahra,S.,&Lan,S.2017.Heterogeneity in new venture formation rates across nations:The schumpeterian and institutional economics views.In Entrepreneurial Finance:Managerial and Policy Implications(The World Scientific Reference on Entrepreneurship Volume 2).World Scientific Publishing Co.Pte Ltd.1-35.
• [22]Lingo,E.L.,&O’Mahony,S.2010.Nexus work:Brokerage on creative projects.Administrative Science Quarterly,55:47-81.
• [23]Lounsbury,M.2002.Institutional transformation and status mobility:The professionalization of the field of finance.Academy of Management Journal,45:255-266.
• [24]Lounsbury,M.,&Glynn,M.A.2001.Cultural entrepreneurship:Stories,legitimacy,and the acquisition of resources.Strategic Management Journal,22:545-564.
• [25]Lounsbury,M.,&Glynn,M.A.2019.Cultural entrepreneurship:A new agenda for the study of entrepreneurial processes and possibilities.Cambridge,New York:Cambridge University Press.
• [26]Marquis,C.,&Lounsbury,M.2007.Vive la résistance:Competing logics and the consolidation of U.S.community banking.Academy of Management Journal,50:799-820.
• [27]Meyer,J.W.,&Rowan,B.1977.Institutionalized organizations:Formal structure as myth and ceremony.American Journal of Sociology,83:340-363.
• [28]Navis,C.,&Glynn,M.A.2010.How new market categories emerge:Temporal dynamics of legitimacy,identity,and entrepreneurship in satellite radio,1990-2005.Administrative Science Quarterly,55:439-471.
• [29]North,D.C.1990.Institutions,institutional change and economic performance.Cambridge,New York:Cambridge University Press.
• [30]Ostrom,E.2005.Understanding Institutional Diversity.Princeton,New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
• [31]Ostrom,E.2010.Beyond markets and states:Polycentric governance of complex economic systems.American Economic Review,100:641-672.
• [32]Ramirez,F.O.,Soysal,Y.,&Shanahan,S.1997.The changing logic of political citizenship:Cross-national acquisition of women’s suffrage rights,1890 to 1990.American Sociological Review,62:735-745.
• [33]Schumpeter,J.A.1934.The theory of economic development.Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press.
• [34]Schumpeter,J.A.1942.Capitalism,socialism and democracy.New York:Harper and Row.
• [35]Scott,W.R.,Ruef,M.,Mendel,P.J.,&Caronna,C.A.2000.Institutional change and healthcare organizations:From professional dominance to managed care.Chicago and London:University of Chicago Press.
• [36]Siegel,J.,Kodama,N.,&Halaburda,H.2014.The unfairness trap:A key missing factor in the economic theory of discrimination.Harvard Business School Working Paper.
• [37]Spillman,L.2002.Introduction:Culture and cultural sociology.In L.Spillman,ed.Cultural Sociology.Malden,MA:Blackwell Publishers.
• [38]Swidler,A.1986.Culture in action:Symbols and strategies.American Sociological Review,51:273-286.
• [39]Thornton,P.H.,&Ocasio,W.1999.Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations:Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry,1958-1990.American Journal of Sociology,105:801-843.
• [40]Thornton,P.H.,Ocasio,W.,&Lounsbury,M.2012.The Institutional Logics Perspective:A New Approach to Culture,Structure,and Process.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
• [41]Venkataraman,S.1997.The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research.In Katz,J.A.,ed.Advances in entrepreneurship,firm emergence and growth Greenwich,CT:JAI Press.
• [42]Zahra,S.A.2007.Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research.Journal of Business Venturing,22:443-452.
• [43]Zhao,E.Y.,Fisher,G.,Lounsbury,M.,&Miller,D.2017.Optimal distinctiveness:Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management.Strategic Management Journal,38:93-113.
• [44]Zhao,E.Y.,Ishihara,M.,Jennings,P.D.,&Lounsbury,M.2018.Optimal distinctiveness in the console video game industry:An exemplar-based model of proto-category evolution.Organization Science,29:588-611.
• [45]Zhao,E.Y.,&Lounsbury,M.2016.An institutional logics approach to social entrepreneurship:Market logic,religious diversity,and resource acquisition by microfinance organizations.Journal of Business Venturing,31:643-662.
• [46]Zhao,E.Y.,&Wry,T.2016.Not all inequality is equal:Deconstructing the societal logic of patriarchy to understand microfinance lending to women.Academy of Management Journal,59:1994-2020.
• [47]Zhao,E.Y.,&Yang,L.2019.Women hold up half the sky?Examining the gender gap in the privately owned Chinese ventures.Indiana University Working Paper.
• (1)制度间系统,inter-institutional system。
• (1)历史权变,historically contingent。